top of page

Sample Assignment 1

The economic and social rights covered by the ICESCR have never been enforceable in either international or domestic practice and therefore should be treated as mere aspirations. Agree or disagree. Explain why?

It is agree from the statement of Alston, economic and social rights are recognized to be goals or aspirations rather than real rights because both these rights were different in their nature and its ambiguity is an explanation behind their being unmanageably intricate. Thus, there had been a division between the two arrangements of rights. Article 2 of the ICESCR reflects and keeps up the previously mentioned conceptualization of ESRs. Article 2 of the ICESCR states that each state party should “take steps … to the maximum of its available sources, with a view to accomplishing continuously the complete realization of the rights” (“progressive realization”). Social, economic and social rights are not negligible desires, or objectives to be accomplished continuously after some time. Under international law, states have quick and also longer term commitments. Notwithstanding their phase of advancement, states must make a move to satisfy financial, social and social rights (counting surveying their laws and approaches), and should cease from disregarding these rights. States are needed to “respect and ensure” political and civil rights, they are required only to “achieve progressively the full realization of” economic, social and cultural rights.

Despite the fact that progressive realization applies to numerous things there are still some quick commitments incorporate important rights be acknowledged without segregation; all appropriate means mean be pursued i.e. must step toward acknowledgment, including organization, financial, legislation, authorization, and amid monetary challenges must make focused on move with regards to the destitute. In any case, the view that ESRs are positive, asset concentrated and dynamic rights depends on a thin comprehension of these rights and of relating state commitments. A minimum core obligation requires the state to guarantee the fulfillment of, in any event, least basic levels of every one of the rights for everyone and ought to do as such as a need paying little heed to asset limitations. Though each privilege must be analyzed independently, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has given some direction on what may constitute the fundamental levels of each right. In this manner, for instance, a state party in which any noteworthy number of people is denied of basic foodstuffs, of basic essential human services, of fundamental haven and lodging, or of the most fundamental types of training is, at first sight, neglecting to release its commitments under the Covenant. With regards to right to adequate food General Comment No. 12 (1999) notes state obligations to "fulfill" (provide and facilitate) and respect" (negative-not interfere with access).

Acknowledgment of cultural, social and economic rights is not constrained to UN bodies, human rights defenders or. grassroots campaigners. Nobel Prize-winning business analyst Amartya Sen characterizes starvation as far as an absence of privileges. He thinks about that the right of access to food and to the profitable assets, (for example, land) that enable individuals to encourage themselves, is basic to fighting starvation; sustenance might be accessible, or even bottomless, yet frequently is as yet not available to all[1]. Further, the right to education envelops the right to free and mandatory essential training, and expanding access to optional, specialized, professional and advanced education [2]. It cuts over the false separation between human rights, as it has social, financial, political, civil and social components. Understanding individuals' right to education diminishes their defenselessness to child labour, segregation, early marriage and numerous other human rights mishandle. As per Weiner, Child labour is sustained by government inability to require free and obligatory primary education[3].

The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) has cleared up the obligation of states to guarantee a viable remedy for infringement of cultural, economic and social rights under Article 2(1) of the ICESCR. “"The Covenant standards must be perceived in suitable routes inside the local legitimate request, proper methods for review, or remedies must be accessible to any bothered group or individual and fitting methods for guaranteeing administrative responsibility must be set up". The presence of compelling remedies can reinforce the bartering energy of individuals and groups living in destitution, who are influenced by infringement to assert their rights from governments. In addition, What's more, ICESCR secures the right to participate in social life to pick his or her own character, to participate in the political existence of society, to take part in their own social practices, to communicate in the dialect of their decision, to know and comprehend their own particular culture and those of others, through instruction and data, and to be engaged with making the profound, material, scholarly and enthusiastic articulations of the group.

Economic, social and cultural rights are presently broadly perceived as enforceable in the courts (justiciable) under both national and global law. In public interest litigation before the Supreme Court of India, the right to life has been comprehensively deciphered to cover rights including those to education, health and opportunity from the destructive impacts of natural debasement. Throughout the years the Indian courts have reclassified the connection between directive principles and fundamental rights by incorporating the two classes with the goal that the last turn out to be adequately enforceable. The readings beneath begin with sources of this expansive approach through the methods for 'public interest litigation'.

At the national level, an ever increasing number of nations, i.e. South Africa, Nigeria and India, grasp ESRs in their constitutions with various levels of requirement as of late. So also, different cases, i.e. Grootboom, Soobramoney and Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation show how South Africa and India, nations with constrained assets, abjudicate the right to health care and shelter. In like manner, the Constitutional Court of South Africa has maintained monetary, cultural and social rights incorporated into the 1996 Constitution. It has built up a comprehension of the state's obligation to act "reasonably" to logically guarantee access to adequate housing and essential medicines, specifically through organizing the most powerless individuals.

Whenever economic, social and cultural rights are damaged, all casualties, regardless of whether they are people, gatherings or entire groups, have the right to a successful remedy. The presence of compelling remedies can fortify the bargaining power of individuals and groups living in destitution, who are influenced by violations to assert their rights from governments. One case is Treatment Action Campaign’s work to guarantee access to life-saving health care for individuals living with HIV/AIDS in South Africa. Like never before, financial, social and cultural rights are an essential piece of the human rights plan. Advancing and safeguarding financial, cultural and social rights ought to be a pressing need, not only for individual governments, but rather for the worldwide group and civil society and the human rights development. Amartya Sen additionally underscored the significance of civil and political rights and said two methodologies for facilitate improvement, hard approach that maintains a strategic distance from social welfare and deregulates business; and neighborly course which acknowledges the results for customary individuals.


[1] The New Republic. Excerpts from Amartya Sen, Freedoms and Needs, The New Republic (January 10 and 17, 1994)

[2] Allen Hubsch, 'Note: The Emerging Right to Education under State Constitutional Law', 65 Temple L. Rev. 1325 (1992); and Woods and Lewis, Human Rights and the Global Marketplace: Economic, Social and Cultural Dimensions (2005), at 901-11

[3] Myron Weiner, Child Labour In Developing Countries: The Indian Case 2 Int. J. Children's Rts.121 (1994)

bottom of page